I should also ask an uncomfortable question: If the software was originally developed in-house, on school property, using school equipment, and on school pay, shouldn't this continue to be property of USD 348? Or, should it just default to the personal property of the school employee's LLC?
Did Morford develop this software as a partner in this LLC, or as the systems engineer for the district?
Jones down-bumped this story because of your critical analysis of his/her reporting--or lack thereof.
As far as the for-profit business referenced in this story, I think it is just another instance of businesses profiting off the backs of the taxpayers in this state. I don't like the trend. I hope this fact is not overlooked within the pages of the grant proposal.
Whether, or not, you think my opinion is "not what Baldwin is about," is fairly meaningless to me.
Dorathy started the conversation on conceal-carry in schools? Hahahahahhahhh Even thinking this is worth talking about really speaks about the character of the person heading our school district.
This intersection has been a topic for some time now--yes, although it is only a problem because of lack of foresight from the school boards of past. Its safety does need addressed. Think of it as "leaving it better than how you found it" mantra. Hopefully, we will be widening the bridge by 11th Street in order to deal with the bottlenecking that happens there. The bridges further west have nothing to do with the safety of this intersection.
As far as the previous two posters, I agree that we should not lose sight of our city center (and its infrastructure), but remember that we just had the downtown revitalization/bridge project completed a few years back. So, the argument falls short.
Baldwin USD 348 superintendent wary of state, federal actions
Also, who is Ruth Busby?
March 21, 2013 at 10:06 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Baldwin USD 348 superintendent wary of state, federal actions
Crafty way of getting a no-bid contract here.
I should also ask an uncomfortable question: If the software was originally developed in-house, on school property, using school equipment, and on school pay, shouldn't this continue to be property of USD 348? Or, should it just default to the personal property of the school employee's LLC?
Did Morford develop this software as a partner in this LLC, or as the systems engineer for the district?
March 21, 2013 at 10 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
City, partners seeking grant for historic depot upgrades
See what you did there, Mr. Attorney?
Jones down-bumped this story because of your critical analysis of his/her reporting--or lack thereof.
As far as the for-profit business referenced in this story, I think it is just another instance of businesses profiting off the backs of the taxpayers in this state. I don't like the trend. I hope this fact is not overlooked within the pages of the grant proposal.
Whether, or not, you think my opinion is "not what Baldwin is about," is fairly meaningless to me.
February 7, 2013 at 3:18 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Baldwin school board starts conversation on staff concealed carry, armed guards in schools
Dorathy started the conversation on conceal-carry in schools? Hahahahahhahhh
Even thinking this is worth talking about really speaks about the character of the person heading our school district.
February 6, 2013 at 8:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Ideas sought for Baldwin City statue
John Brown!
February 6, 2013 at 8:20 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
City, partners seeking grant for historic depot upgrades
I like how the for-profit entity is putting up the least amount--but, of course, being very cooperative.
February 6, 2013 at 8:18 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Baker student signs on for Peace Corps tour after graduation
Very cool.
December 13, 2012 at 7:44 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Tonight's BHS games last to be played at different venues
Actually, you might want to plan on having the Ottawa v. Baldwin game at Collins--it's going to draw the crowd.
December 13, 2012 at 7:40 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Baldwin USD 348 agrees to donate easement for expanded KDOT project
This intersection has been a topic for some time now--yes, although it is only a problem because of lack of foresight from the school boards of past. Its safety does need addressed. Think of it as "leaving it better than how you found it" mantra. Hopefully, we will be widening the bridge by 11th Street in order to deal with the bottlenecking that happens there. The bridges further west have nothing to do with the safety of this intersection.
As far as the previous two posters, I agree that we should not lose sight of our city center (and its infrastructure), but remember that we just had the downtown revitalization/bridge project completed a few years back. So, the argument falls short.
November 21, 2012 at 7:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Baldwin school board moves to refinance bond debt
So .......
What are the five options given by Dorathy?
Good job by Piper Jaffray--way to look out for the interests of the tax payers here in the Baldwin District!
November 21, 2012 at 7:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )